---

Friends, Gary Bauer, of the powerful Family Research Council, is forming his own PAC. I'm sure it will powerful given his recourses, and of course support of his parent organization, Focus on the Family. Thought you'd want to know. Skip Evans, President Americans United for Separation of Church and State Atlanta Chapter Following is a letter from Gary L. Bauer of the Family Research Council to his flock announcing the formation of his new PAC, which he registered with the FEC last Election Day: ________________________________ February 6, 1997 Dear Friend, This may be the most important letter I write you this year. I want to explain to you a new political action plan I have developed, why it is needed, and how you can play a major role in its success. Over the last three months I have received hundreds of letters and phone calls from friends like you around the country expressing your frustration about the 1996 elections. I assure you that I share that frustration. Once again we had a presidential race in which the candidates of the two major parties ignored or were hostile to the values we believe in. I wasn't surprised that Bill Clinton continued to champion abortion on demand and the homosexual rights movement while using pro-family rhetoric. He has used this tactic before. But how does one explain the Republican ticket missing one opportunity after another to challenge their opponents on the issues of heart and soul? The outcome was predictable our country experienced one of the lowest voter turnouts in history, and Bill Clinton has four more years to promote his liberal agenda, appoint radical judges to our courts, and expand the power of government at the expense of the family. It could have been even worse. In congressional races, pro-family and prolife candidates were subjected to a relentless barrage of negative advertising from liberal special interest groups and the hostile media establishment. Some independent observers have estimated that as much as $ 100 million was spent by the interest groups to label pro-family candidates as extremist and radical. While many conservatives were re-elected, others lost because they didn't have the resources to respond to these smear tactics. All signs point to our opponents continuing this strategy in the 1998 congressional elections and the presidential race in 2000. Already members of the House and Senate who are pro-family and believe in smaller government and free enterprise are being targeted for defeat. And in the presidential sweepstakes we face the possibility of another race where the candidates of neither major party defend our values. Some Republican consultants and pollsters are once again advising the GOP to abandon the pro-life cause and downplay our family issues - despite the obviously disastrous impact of this advice in 1992 and 1996. They seem to never learn. Enough is enough. We have been losing by default. I made a promise on election night that I would do everything I could to make sure that in future campaigns our values receive a fair hearing. I want candidates to defend the sanctity of human life. I want someone to stand up for reliable standards of right and wrong and to defend marriage. I want candidates who will support real educational reform and the rights of parents. These values must be defended as we go into the next century. As you know, the Family Research Council, which I run here in Washington, D.C., is not permitted under the law to participate in partisan political activity. Even my other organization, American Renewal, is only permitted to influence legislation - not campaigns. Bold new steps must be taken. A few weeks ago, I registered with the Federal Election Commission a political action committee called the Campaign for Working Families. It has one central purpose and one purpose only: to elect pro-family, pro-life, pro-free enterprise candidates to the House and the Senate every two years, and to the White House in the year 2000. Now I know that political action committees (or PACs, as the media refers to them) receive a lot of negative publicity. But they are the only way under our laws that like-minded citizens can join together to raise money to support candidates for office or to vote out bad politicians. I will run the Campaign for Working Families following the highest ethical standards. And I am humbly asking you to be a partner with me in this important project. Time and time again, you have stood with me in some big battles in Washington. I am praying you will do it one more time. My goals are simple. I want to put together at least 100,000 pro-life, pro-family activists who are willing to financially support good candidates in key political races around the country. If we do that we will be one of the biggest political action groups in America! Think of what that could mean in countering the pro-abortion and pro-homosexual rights crowd that has so much power here in Washington. Think of what we could do to ensure that the tax burden on families is lowered and that American workers have more opportunity. Perhaps most importantly, I want to be sure that four years from now the Republican Party nominates a candidate for president who believes in our values - and is willing to say so to the American people! Imagine the presidential debates four years from now. Imagine how gratifying it would be to see a major presidential candidate argue for the sanctity of human life, defend working families, make the case for traditional marriage, argue for lower taxes and smaller government. Now, I want to make it clear that we won't just support Republicans. We are looking for candidates in every party. And if the GOP in four years ignores our concerns again, we will have to consider other options. The Campaign for Working Families will support a set of ideas that we share in common - not just support one political party. The possibilities are exciting. If 100,000 of our friends would make an average donation of $50 in the next month, we could raise $5 million to prepare for the next election cycle! We could begin to counter the left-wing propaganda that misled the American people in 1996. I know the demands on your resources. I hesitated many months even to come to you with this project. Many of you may be unable to afford to give anything at this time. Please don't feel pressured. I understand how hard it is for American families to meet all of their financial responsibilities. Do not divert funds from your church or charitable activities for this project. If you can't give now, then please pray for our work. But some of you may be able to help now with $5, $10, $50, $100 or more. I hope you will consider the Campaign for Working Families worthy of your support. This may be the most important project the pro-family movement undertakes in the next four years. Whether you can help or not, I want to thank each of you for all you have done to make my work in Washington possible. I have no greater blessings than your friendship and prayers. I promise you that every day here in the nation's capital I will continue to do everything I can to defend our values and strive to make America a shining city upon a hill for our children and grandchildren. With God's grace we will succeed. May you and your family enjoy all of God's blessings in 1997. Sincerely, Gary L. Bauer ______________ (For more information contact Watch97@aol.com. To receive the timely reportage/commentary of The "c.c.watch" Electronic News Service -- send message "Subscribe" PLUS your real name/affiliation/reason for wanting to be added to our public service list. "c.c.watch" tracks and reports on the activities of Pat Robertson, his many enterprises [especially the Christian Coalition], and his fellow travelers -- and then disseminates information that the public might never otherwise receive.)

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank